eQSL.cc Forum
Help!  eQSL.cc Home  Forums Home  Search  Login 
Viewing User Profile for: TF3KX Kristinn Andersen
About Contact
Joined: Jan 12, 2004 02:51 AM
Last Post: Jan 18, 2006 03:56 PM
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2006 03:45 PM
Website:  
Location:
Interests:
Favorite Bands:
Favorite Modes:


Send Private Message
Post Statistics
TF3KX Kristinn Andersen has contributed to 1 posts out of 11661 total posts (0.01%) in 7,463 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:

Hi:

Some of my 160m QSOs appear as 70cm or 17m QSOs in eQSL. My ADIF comes from the Logger32 software and I cannot see anything wrong with the ADIF entries. It occurred to me, however, that having a comma (,) as a decimal character (instead of the period) might mess things up. Europeans and North Americans interchange the use of , and . (decimal point vs. thousands separator) and my computer is set up for the European use, which is adopted here.

Any comments on my band designation problem and its possible relation to the decimal character difference? Alternatively, the band problem may be caused by the fact that some 160m QSOs have been uploaded two times (which I assumed would be OK and the duplicates ignored?).

To illustrate, I have here two ADIF entries on 160m: 9A3B appears as a 70cm QSO in eQSL while SM6CNN appears properly on 160m in eQSL. Note that 9A3B was uploaded twice, while SM6CNN has only been uploaded once:

<BAND:4>160M <CALL:4>9A3B <CONT:2>EU <CQZ:2>15 <DXCC:3>497 <FREQ:8>1,820000 <ITUZ:2>28 <MODE:2>CW <NOTES:25>Band and mode most likely <OPERATOR:5>TF3KX <QSO_DATE:8:D>19961222 <RST_RCVD:3>599 <RST_SENT:3>599 <TIME_ON:6>033000 <TIME_OFF:6>033000 <APP_LOGGER32_QSO_NUMBER:3>315 <EOR>

<BAND:4>160M <CALL:6>SM6CNN <CONT:2>EU <CQZ:2>14 <DXCC:3>284 <FREQ:8>1,823000 <ITUZ:2>18 <MODE:2>CW <OPERATOR:5>TF3KX <PFX:3>SM6 <QSO_DATE:8:D>20051216 <RST_RCVD:3>599 <RST_SENT:3>599 <TIME_ON:6>234243 <TIME_OFF:6>234243 <TX_PWR:3>100 <APP_LOGGER32_QSO_NUMBER:4>6965 <EOR>

73 - Kris, TF3KX

TF3KX Kristinn Andersen