 |
|
eQSL.cc Home
Search
Login
Authors
Recent Posts| Viewing User Profile for: AJ4DT Dennis | |||||||||||||||||
| About | Contact | ||||||||||||||||
|
Send Private Message |
||||||||||||||||
| Post Statistics | |||||||||||||||||
|
AJ4DT Dennis has contributed to 1 posts out of 11815 total posts
(0.01%) in 4,190 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Getting more eQSLs »
Why do eqsl members dont QSL Apr 17, 2014 03:40 AM
(Total replies: 7)
Quote: I'm getting around 70% confirmation here. I think the difference is since 2006 I do only digital modes. It seems digital mode op's are more likely to confirm, not sure why that is, but I've heard similar stats from other digi-mode operators. Automatic logging/uploading built into digital mode software is probably a factor. I know I use it and love it for that very reason. I do make every effort to log and upload SSB contacts; but I'm sure I've missed some when I wasn't in front of or signed in to my station PC.I don't use LoTW or QRZ logbook. --- Original message by VA3KAB David Bell on Apr 1, 2014 11:11 AM Most of my contesting is SSB, and I do upload the final log from any contest .. which obviously has to be accurately logged. In general response my MO and why: I agree with others that eQSL has a far superior intake system by allowing/being supported by HRD for automated instant uploads; LoTW I do in batches when I have the time. As for QRZ logs, just too much trouble. Only thing I do there is if I look up a call sign while in QSO; I will click the button for log a contact. Entering all the info manually .. no thanks. I would go into QRZ and confirm any QSO upon request, though. AJ4DT Dennis E Tokarzewski |
|||||||||||||||||