Joined: |
May 23, 2006 03:59 PM |
Last Post: |
Jan 15, 2009 06:58 PM |
Last Visit: |
Apr 29, 2010 08:52 PM |
Website: |
|
Location: |
|
Interests: |
|
Favorite Bands: |
|
Favorite Modes: |
|
|
Send Private Message
|
GI7OMY Daithi O Buitigh has contributed to 1 posts out of 11815 total posts
(0.01%) in 6,928 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
I get a lot of QSOs where they are very emphatic that they don't want eqsls - in fact I even got an e-mail from another op berating me for having the audacity to send him one. Personally, I don't care if they download it or not but I do send one for every QSO I make (and with over 7500 QSOs over the past year or so, I'd be sitting on a mountain of paper if I went that route - HI)
What I have noticed is a sudden influx of QSLs dating back a couple of years (including a long-forgotten SSB contact on 40 with Indonesia which just arrived a couple of days ago).
Now that the word is out that CQ magazine is accepting eqsl, I think there will be a lot more returns - I have noticed it getting harder to access my inbox (the server is approaching meltdown - nearly as bad as getting Windows 7 Beta - HI).
Any that I do get that need confirmation get confirmed after I double check in my log - there are a few that manage to slip through. In the case of SWL reports, I just check that I was on air and on that band at the time they report
73 de Daithi GI7OMY
GI7OMY Daithi O Buitigh
|
|