
VK5PO John F. McRae
Posts: 1
Joined: Feb 14, 2003

|
Posted: Jan 28, 2013 12:10 AM

Msg. 1 of 2
I really think eQSL.cc need to display something like this text in bold letters:
Please CROSS CHECK thoroughly all QSO's, to ensure that you DO NOT falsely claim an eQSL, by either not checking properly, or willful actions!!!!
FALSE CLAIMS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
I mention this as I can PROVE that this kind of behavior has taken place.
NO one likes a CHEAT.
Please consider this request, as I feel it is imperative to HOLD and MAINTAIN total credibility with the eQSL system. 73 guys, And thank You. John McRae, VK5PO
VK5PO John F. McRae
|

N1ORK Orest Andy Zajac
Posts: 942
Joined: Sep 7, 2006
QRZ..QRZ..Any one out there?..Is this thing on??
|
Posted: Jan 28, 2013 01:14 PM

Msg. 2 of 2
John, If you are referring to the Confirm or Reject buttons in the InBox, I agree that one should be honest in what one does. Make sure you have the QSO in your log before you confirm a QSO. If not, reject it and provide why you rejected the QSO. Many times I have gotten an eQSL for my main call that should have been for my /P call. I reject that eQSL and ask the Ham to re-submit the eQSL to my n1ork/p account. Many times I later see the eQSL in the correct account. If I get an eQSL from a SWLer, I first verify that the SWLer has given the correct calls, times and band before I confirm the SWL report. I agree that something should be added as a CAUTION to the InBox display to remind Hams to verify first, then either confirm or reject the eQSL. 73
N1ORK Orest 'Andy' Zajac
|