
IT2024SWL oscar marazzini
Posts: 34
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

|
Posted: Mar 4, 2015 06:01 PM

Msg. 1 of 4
I am a little astonished. Could someone explain me this email I got:
Subject: Problem with one of your eQSL log entries > >Dear IT2024SWL, > >This is RW4M. >I have examined a log entry you uploaded >for a QSO on January 2, 2015 at 16:48 >on the 40m band and found a problem with the eQSL: > >CFM ur SWL. But your SWL-report is NOT 2-way QSO. So PLEASE remove this entry... >Please check your OutBox. >You can edit your logbook and correct any mistakes, >or delete the log entry, by going to "OutBox". >If you disagree, please send an e-mail >to RW4M or just hit REPLY. > >Sincerely, > >RW4M
So: as far as I understand he confirms by email my SWL-report but he has rejected the eQSL and he is asking to remove because it's not a 2 way QSO.
How can I do a 2 way QSO?
IT2024SWL oscar marazzini
|

VA3KAB David Bell
Posts: 1056
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
|
Posted: Mar 5, 2015 05:59 PM

Msg. 2 of 4
That is an odd one! Maybe he doesn't understand that SWL accounts are treated differently in the database so that they show as SWL report and not 2-way QSO?
73, Dave - VA3KAB
|

M3ONL Adrian
Posts: 4
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

|
Posted: May 10, 2015 03:35 PM

Msg. 3 of 4
Have you replied to him to explain the nature of the report, maybe RW4M needs a gentle reminder that many hams started out as SWL's..
M3ONL Adrian
|

IT2024SWL oscar marazzini
Posts: 34
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2015 08:14 PM

Msg. 4 of 4
I told him that an SWL cannot make a 2 way QSO because we only listen. It's a pleasure to get any confirmation from any country, even when not needed I have some hundreds from Russia.
IT2024SWL oscar marazzini
|