
DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 10:52 AM

Msg. 1 of 11
Hallo ! warum werden Sonderprefixe wie z.B. EM2012GG nicht als gültige Prefixe zum ePFx300 gezählt ? Wer weiß weiter ? vy 73 de Gerd
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

VA3KAB David Bell
Posts: 1056
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 01:11 PM

Msg. 2 of 11
Hallo, ich bin nicht sicher, ob Google Translate übersetzt richtig Ihre Nachricht. Wenn Sie gefragt werden, ob EM2012GG gilt für ePFX300 sind, die Antwort ist ja, ist das Präfix für diesen Anruf EM2012.
Hello, I am not sure if google translate properly translated your message. If you are asking if EM2012GG is valid for ePFX300, the answer is it is, the prefix for that call is EM2012.
73, Dave - VA3KAB
|

DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 07:34 PM

Msg. 3 of 11
Hi Dave, i have worked this call and also EO2012IS, but i cant find them in the list for the ePFx award. You can find them in my archive list. Is there a bug ? vy 73 de Gerd, dk4fp
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 07:34 PM

Msg. 4 of 11
Hi Dave, i have worked this call and also EO2012IS, but i cant find them in the list for the ePFx award. You can find them in my archive list. Is there a bug ? vy 73 de Gerd, dk4fp
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 07:35 PM

Msg. 5 of 11
Hi Dave, i have worked this call and also EO2012IS, but i cant find them in the list for the ePFx award. You can find them in my archive list. Is there a bug ? vy 73 de Gerd, dk4fp
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 07:35 PM

Msg. 6 of 11
Hi Dave, i have worked this call and also EO2012IS, but i cant find them in the list for the ePFx award. You can find them in my archive list. Is there a bug ? vy 73 de Gerd, dk4fp
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

DK4FP Gerd Jung
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 07:35 PM

Msg. 7 of 11
Hi Dave, i have worked this call and also EO2012IS, but i cant find them in the list for the ePFx award. You can find them in my archive list. Is there a bug ? vy 73 de Gerd, dk4fp
DK4FP Gerd Jung
|

VA3KAB David Bell
Posts: 1056
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
|
Posted: Jun 3, 2012 08:12 PM

Msg. 8 of 11
Hi Gerd,
It is not a bug. I checked both of those users, the reason they are not showing up as credits is because neither one of them has AG status.
You could maybe use the send email to another user tool and request that they get AG? I think many users don't realize how easy it is to get, and also don't realize that it doesn't cost anything.
73, Dave - VA3KAB
|

DK7ZH Manfred Busch
Posts: 92
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
|
Posted: Jun 4, 2012 08:11 AM

Msg. 9 of 11
Stationen sind nur für eDiplome gültig, die auch AG-Status haben. Siehe: http://www.eqsl.cc/Member.cfm?EO2012ISDas Problem würde sich dadurch lösen, dass man erst dann seine QSOs uploaden darf wenn der AG-Status vorliegt !!! 73 de Manfred, DK7ZH
|

VA3KAB David Bell
Posts: 1056
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
|
Posted: Jun 4, 2012 12:43 PM

Msg. 10 of 11
Das ist das Problem mit der Verwendung einer übersetzen Werkzeug, um Fragen zu beantworten. Von der ersten E-Mail Ich dachte, dass Gerd wurde gefragt, ob der Anruf selbst gültig war, wusste ich nicht erkennen, er fragte, warum der Anruf nicht angezeigt wurde als Kredit :) Es war nicht, bis er auf Englisch antwortete, dass ich verstand, was das Problem war.
That is the problem with using a translate tool to answer questions. From the first email I thought that Gerd was asking if the call itself was valid, I didn't realize he was asking why the call was not showing up as a credit :) It wasn't until he replied in English that I understood what the issue was.
73, Dave - VA3KAB
|

DO1IP Udo Sander
Posts: 5
Joined: Apr 11, 2012

|
Posted: Jan 21, 2013 07:40 PM

Msg. 11 of 11
Das ist genau DIE Lösung. Und warum macht man das nicht seitens eQSL??
DO1IP Udo Sander
|