WA3SEE CARL OLSON
Posts: 2
Joined: Jan 14, 2009
|
Posted: May 7, 2009 02:33 PM
Msg. 1 of 6
Last week a station emailed me explaining they were rejecting my eQSL, because after exchange of both our callsigns and each other's signal reports they did not copy my reply to their final "73".
I received no notification thru eQSL that any of my eQSL had been rejected.
And it appears the other station "Archived" my "card".
Seems unethical to me.
WA3SEE CARL OLSON
|
IW5ELL Cosimo Musca
Posts: 110
Joined: Sep 9, 2005
|
Posted: May 8, 2009 07:50 AM
Msg. 2 of 6
In this case i delete immediately my eqsl! 73 de Cosimo IW5ELL
|
VE3OIJ P. Darin Cowan
Posts: 186
Joined: Jul 9, 2006
|
Posted: Jul 16, 2009 11:23 PM
Msg. 3 of 6
I agree with Cosimo. If someone wants to jerk me around, deleting the QSO is easy enough. I only recall this happening once in my few thousand QSO though.
VE3OIJ P. Darin Cowan
|
N1ORK/P Orest
Posts: 61
Joined: May 10, 2007
N1ORK/P from Freedom, NH USA
|
Posted: Jul 17, 2009 09:51 AM
Msg. 4 of 6
But, can an eQSL be deleted if it has been archived by the other ham? 73 Andy - n1ork
N1ORK/P Orest 'Andy' Zajac Edited by N1ORK/P Orest on Jul 17, 2009 at 09:51 AM
|
VE3OIJ P. Darin Cowan
Posts: 186
Joined: Jul 9, 2006
|
Posted: Aug 1, 2009 06:51 PM
Msg. 5 of 6
as far as I know it can. It's just a database entry.
VE3OIJ P. Darin Cowan
|
OK1-36292 Mirek Mach
Posts: 4
Joined: Jun 9, 2009
|
Posted: Oct 1, 2009 02:01 AM
Msg. 6 of 6
I don't see why some HAMs are members of eQSL. For example such OE1GOA. My correspondence with him:
Dear Greg, you rejected my SWL eQSL from 21Sep2009 2131UTC (you worked with ES0IC on 80m PSK31). May I ask you where I did mistake? Thanks for your answer. 73, Mirek OK1-36292
And his answer:
Just don`t wish/send eQSL 73 Greg
Why he is member? Why?? I vote for blacklist!
OK1-36292 Mirek Mach
(07Oct2009 1116UTC - Edited some grammaticals errors) Edited by OK1-36292 Mirek Mach on Oct 7, 2009 at 11:16 AM
|