
N4AU Bobby E Chandler
Posts: 5
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

|
Posted: Dec 18, 2005 09:05 AM

Msg. 1 of 9
Why can't we upload 160 meter entries? Eqsl says that is not a good band.
N4AU Bobby E Chandler
|

W3ZJ Rich Drake
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 11, 2000
eQSL Support Volunteer
|
Posted: Dec 20, 2005 07:33 AM

Msg. 2 of 9
160 meters is a perfectly good band. Make sure that you have actually entered one six zero and not one six oscar. Also be sure that there are no leading or trailing blanks in the number.
73, Rich - W3ZJ
|

G4VXE TIM KIRBY
Posts: 95
Joined: Aug 13, 2000
eQSL Support Team
|
Posted: Dec 20, 2005 11:54 AM

Msg. 3 of 9
Don't forget that the ADIF spec defines both a Band and a Freq tag - if you tried to upload 160 in the Freq field, it might get a bit upset.
I saw your question to support, Bobby and I've recommended you run the file through Rich's ADIF preprocessor, which you can download from www.w3zj.com
Tim, G4VXE
|

W3ZJ Rich Drake
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 11, 2000
eQSL Support Volunteer
|
Posted: Dec 20, 2005 02:41 PM

Msg. 4 of 9
Quote: Don't forget that the ADIF spec defines both a Band and a Freq tag - if you tried to upload 160 in the Freq field, it might get a bit upset.
I saw your question to support, Bobby and I've recommended you run the file through Rich's ADIF preprocessor, which you can download from www.w3zj.com
--- Original message by G4VXE TIM KIRBY on Dec 20, 2005 11:54 AM Good point Tim. Yes Band means band and Frequency means frequency in MHz. if you put band in a frequency field or frequency in a band field it will not work. ADIFProc will indeed catch such errors. 73, Rich - W3ZJ
|

N4AU Bobby E Chandler
Posts: 5
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

|
Posted: Dec 20, 2005 06:07 PM

Msg. 5 of 9
Thanks for all the responses. The file was apparently OK since it uploaded fine to LoTW. It was created with the N3FJP Stew Perry logging program. Anyhow, I got all the contacts entered with ACLog by sending the contacts one at the time.
Thanks again. Bobby
N4AU Bobby E Chandler
|

G4VXE TIM KIRBY
Posts: 95
Joined: Aug 13, 2000
eQSL Support Team
|
Posted: Dec 22, 2005 07:44 AM

Msg. 6 of 9
I saw another question along these lines to Support. Does the N3FJP program create ADIF, rather than CABRILLO? LOTW does accept both formats, where as we only take ADIF. Perhaps that may be the reason for the problems?
If you look in the file that was generated - you'd see tags like <BAND:3>20M - whereas in CABRILLO, you'd not see any tags encased in <> characters.
Let us know - it would be handy to understand....
Tim, G4VXE
|

N4AU Bobby E Chandler
Posts: 5
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

|
Posted: Dec 22, 2005 08:12 AM

Msg. 7 of 9
Yes, the program generates both. Here is a sample of the adif file:
ADIF Export from N3FJP's Stew Perry Contest Log 1.0 Written by G. Scott Davis www.n3fjp.com snkdavis@aol.com <PROGRAMID:30>N3FJP's Stew Perry Contest Log Log exported on: 12/18/05 7:14:03 AM
<EOH> <Call:4>KF3B <Qso_Date:8:d>20051217 <Band:3>160M <Mode:2>CW <Tx_Pwr:2>80 <Time_On:4>2054 <Gridsquare:4>FN20 <Comment:18>Stew Perry Contest <eor>
<Call:4>N8UM <Qso_Date:8:d>20051217 <Band:3>160M <Mode:2>CW <Tx_Pwr:2>80 <Time_On:4>2101 <Gridsquare:4>EM75 <Comment:18>Stew Perry Contest <eor>
I did get all the entries submitted, one by one, so not to worry about it.
Thanks, bobby
N4AU Bobby E Chandler
|

W3ZJ Rich Drake
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 11, 2000
eQSL Support Volunteer
|
Posted: Dec 22, 2005 10:16 AM

Msg. 8 of 9
Quote: ADIF Export from N3FJP's Stew Perry Contest Log 1.0 Written by G. Scott Davis www.n3fjp.com snkdavis@aol.com <PROGRAMID:30>N3FJP's Stew Perry Contest Log Log exported on: 12/18/05 7:14:03 AM
<EOH> <Call:4>KF3B <Qso_Date:8:d>20051217 <Band:3>160M <Mode:2>CW <Tx_Pwr:2>80 <Time_On:4>2054 <Gridsquare:4>FN20 <Comment:18>Stew Perry Contest <eor>
<Call:4>N8UM <Qso_Date:8:d>20051217 <Band:3>160M <Mode:2>CW <Tx_Pwr:2>80 <Time_On:4>2101 <Gridsquare:4>EM75 <Comment:18>Stew Perry Contest <eor> --- Original message by N4AU Bobby E Chandler on Dec 22, 2005 08:12 AM The problem with the above ADIF records is that <BAND:3>160M is wrong. It must be <BAND:4>160M. Note that 160M has 4 characters in it, not 3. 73, Rich - W3ZJEdited by W3ZJ Rich Drake on Dec 22, 2005 at 10:25 AM
|

N4AU Bobby E Chandler
Posts: 5
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

|
Posted: Dec 22, 2005 03:08 PM

Msg. 9 of 9
OK Rich and thanks. I just figured that out myself. Tnx and 73, Bobby
N4AU Bobby E Chandler
|